THE EMPYREAN MOVEMENT
(Introduction to Omniarchy)
I will post some of my writings here, with more information forthcoming in my books and essays.


With all the advances in technology, Americans are still using the same political system enacted by white supremacists 250 years ago.
But what if there is a better way?

What if there were a new country with a new political system?
What if we all treated each other like royalty, considering every man a king and every woman a queen?
What if there were no more politicians, but a 100% majority could represent themselves as political equals?
What if freedom could not be amended, but was protected for even the smallest minorities who all got to sign the constitution?
What if power belonged to all people of all colors who could all own land, instead of a ruling class of the few subjugating the earth?
What if we do not need more laws, but only to follow the correct law from the start?


> Omniarchy

The only way to treat all people equally is to grant them all equal individual sovereignty.
The only way to do that is a social contract to which every citizen gives consent.
If everyone agrees to the rules of a society beforehand, then no one is oppressed.
Then society would not be hegemony, but an alliance of monarchs, cooperating for common good.
When participation is strictly voluntary, then every individual is equal to a king.
The right to choose to join or leave is what makes a society free.
Heaven is a place where no one is forced to join and everyone wants to be.
It is a society based, not on force, but on consent.
It would not be heavenly if anyone there did not want to be part of it.
In America, the vast majority of the population never got to choose whether to ratify the constitution.
The only society without slavery is one where everyone can sign up freely.  That society is Empyrean.


> The Law of Free Will

In a spatial environment with multiple beings using free will, they have to find a way to get along, lest conflicts arise among their wills.
The only way everyone can use free will as equals is if everyone only uses it in a way that does not restrict others from so using it too.
Those who deprive others of the ability to use free will cannot reasonably claim to have a right to it themselves.

If you want to live freely, you must allow others to live freely, for if you violate their free will, others can do the same to you.
To do something that impedes the freedom of others and not let them do it to you would be fundamentally unjust.
To restrict the free will of others is basically an act of violence unless they did it first.
To initiate force against the free will of your neighbor is a crime against God who gave free will to all.
Thus, there is essentially only one crime, so there only needs to be one law.

The law is that you must only use your freedom to do those things that do not take away the freedom of your neighbors.

Everyone has free will to make choices, but that does not make all choices right.
There is one principle that governs political relationships in this shared ecosystem:
People can choose to interact either by violence, or by agreement--by force or by consent, by lawlessness or by reasonableness.

If people do as they want without regard to others, it is called anarchy, the law of the jungle, "might makes right," or living by the sword.
Jesus said those who live by the sword will die by the sword (Matthew 26:52).  Animal sacrifices showed what it means to die like an animal.
When people have consideration for their neighbors and work together rather than regarding themselves as better, they obey the law of heaven.

To impose your will on another and set yourself above your neighbor is a violation of freedom and reality.
God is your neighbor, and you are not above God, who has ultimate free will over all.
God gave your other neighbors free will as well as you, so if you try to take it from them, you are really in violation against God.
Jesus said, "All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the Law..." (Matthew 7:12)

It is the fundamental principle of justice--that in anything you do to others, you have no right to complain if they do the same to you.
It is unlawful to do to others what you would not have them do to you.


> Implications of the Law

To use freedom in such a way as to deprive others of the ability to use freedom is the essence of a crime.
The role of government is to protect people against crimes (i.e. violations of their freedom or their "rights").
We can infer five basic types of freedoms that must be protected from crimes, or in other words, five basic rights.
Freedom is fundamental to life because life involves self-directed behavior; a thing without free will is not alive, but a robot.
Life requires freedoms of person, property, contracts, environment, and dependents.


4/27/24
to be continued


Universal Land Ownership
The Government of God
Empyrean and the Gospel
A New Country & Constitution
The Endtimes Role of the Church


Go back to Index